FREE THE EARTH FROM DEVIL SMOKE

Failed intellectuals, arm-chair revolutionaries, frustrated utopians, tyrannical tycoons, spoilt spitritualists, profiteers, corrupt capitalists, lecherous leftists- all have ganged up against humanity in an unholy alliance.

whatever your views, whatever your religion, language, caste, color, creed, credo, nationality, profession, ideology, culture or any idiocyncracy --remember one thing that you will have to live, breathe, drink and eat on this planet EARTH. Therefore you have an obligation and equal right like anyone else to keep this planet livable and breathable. Cigarette smoking is one of the major causes that are making this planet unlivable. Rid yourself of this satanic evil if you are gripped by it and stand up against it. Join my blog and let our voices become one. Let there be synergy in our efforts.

Your non-smoking, non-drinking friend
webscout




Showing posts with label research. Show all posts
Showing posts with label research. Show all posts

Friday, May 7, 2010

WOMEN's AND TOBACCO---REFERENCE-2

  • thetruth.com    - American Legacy Foundation tobacco education campaign covers cigarettes, smoking, other tobacco products. "The truth about how the cigarette industry operates".
  • Tobacco BBS    - Cigarettes, tobacco, and smoking-related news and issues, addresses, tobacco history, information on quitting, and a quote of the day section.
  • Addicted to Nicotine: A National Research Forum - Includes presentation summaries of papers presented at the conference held in 2001 at the (US) National Institutes of Health. Topics include nicotine delivery systems, pharmacology, individual and environmental risk factors, the psychobiology of addition, and treatment of nicotine dependence.
  • Ammonia Added to Cigarettes Can Significantly Boost Availability of Nicotine - Independent research confirms that ammonia added to cigarettes can boost the availability of nicotine up to 100 times.
  • Cancer Facts and Figures - Concise summary from the American Cancer Society of tobacco use, cigarettes, trends in smoking, profiling smokers, costs of tobacco, nicotine addiction, secondhand smoke, spit tobacco, and industrial hazards.
  • CDC's TIPS: Tobacco Information and Prevention Source - Maintained by the CDC's Office on Smoking and Health. Covers tobacco-related issues, statistics, news, research, data, reports, quitting tips, educational materials, publications, . Also sections dedicated to youth.
  • A Collection of Articles on Nicotine Addiction - Articles about research studies funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
  • eMedicine - Nicotine Addiction - Medical facts on the physiology of nicotine addiction, and the effect tobacco products have on the brain, lungs, and other vital organs, and a treatment options section.
  • Good Health -- Healthy Lifestyle - This site is dedicated to convincing people to live a healthy lifestyle, to improve their quality of life, and avoid (or reduce the severity of) chronic disease.
  • 'Impact Booster': Tobacco Firm Shows How Ammonia Spurs Delivery of Nicotine - 1996 Pulitzer prize-winning reporting on how the tobacco industry uses ammonia to engineer cigarettes for addiction.
  • Infofax - Cigarettes and Other Nicotine Products - NIH short summary of nicotine effects.
  • Low Tar Exposed - Site explains why "low tar", "light" and "mild" cigarettes are just as harmful as regular cigarettes.
  • M. D. Anderson Cancer Center - Tobacco & Cancer - University of Texas medical center factsheets on effects of smoking and tobacco, and tips and support for quitting. One-third of M. D. Anderson patients have tobacco-related cancers.
  • Nicotine Addiction - Concise factsheet.
  • Nicotine Addiction in Britain - Complete online book by the Royal College of Physicians; covers physical. pharmacological, and psychological effects; addiction; the smoker's career; regulation of intake; treatment; regulatory approaches; recommendations.
  • Nicotine Addiction in Britain - Includes report produced by the Royal College of Physicians. "Nicotine addiction is one of the major reasons why people continue to smoke cigarettes, and cigarettes are in reality extremely effective and closely controlled nicotine delivery devices".
  • Nicotine and Addiction - ASH-UK factsheet on nicotine, its properties, difficulty in quitting, measures of dependence, withdrawal systems, genetic influence, and tobacco industry recognition of the its importance. [PDF]
  • Nicotine and the Tobacco Industry - Science Week article focuses on 3 decades of tobacco industry efforts to engineer cigarettes for addiction.
  • Nicotine Junkies - Information on kids and smoking, facts about smoking and addiction.
  • Quit Victoria - "Tobacco smoking is the single most important cause of ill health and premature death in Australia." Not just quitting information -- health questions answered; effects of cigarettes; quit evaluation studies; information in languages other than English; smokefree workplaces and dining.
  • Reducing the Addictiveness of Cigarettes - Can cigarettes be made less addictive? Scientific paper examines the question.
  • Report of the UK Scientific Committee on Tobacco and Health - Report covers the scientific evidence on active smoking, passive smoking, nicotine addiction, price and marketing of cigarettes and other tobacco products, cessation, key conclusions.
  • Research Report: Nicotine Addiction - Information from the National Institute on Drug Abuse about nicotine, addiction, the extent and impact of tobacco use, how nicotine delivers its effect, consequences of continued use, treatments, and gender differences.
  • Smoking And Tobacco Factsheets - From the Missouri Health Department, a large set of factsheets on cigarettes, tobacco advertising, health effects, and secondhand smoke.
  • Smoking Is Ugly - Created and sustained by Christy Turlington, an online resource guide, providing information and links to numerous lung cancer and smoking-cessation related websites. SmokingIsUgly.com is part of Turlington's campaign to raise awareness about the effects of smoking, smoking related diseases and lung cancer.
  • TCSG - Tobacco and The Elderly - Papers and factsheets on: tobacco and minorities, state tobacco settlement funds, tobacco and older persons.
  • Tobacco Advertising and Document Collections - Growing set of resources presenting and organizing tobacco industry documents; shows what the industry says in private about youth, advertising, promotions; features a poster on the history of youth cigarette brands.
  • Tobacco Control Online - A quarterly scientific journal covering all aspects of tobacco use prevention and control.
  • Tobacco in Australia: Facts and Issues - A complete, online, book, with all citations to the literature. Covers cigarettes, other tobacco products; statistics and trends; health effects; smoking in the workplace and public places; public policy; addiction; quitting; anti-smoking campaigns; and the tobacco industry.
  • Tobacco Industry Hall of Shame - List of stars and performers killed by tobacco.
  • The Tobacco Reference Guide - Online book provides quotes, summaries, and factsheets about hazards of smoking.
  • TobaccoFree - Offers smoking cessation tips, research results, and tips for staying smoke free.
  • WHO: The Tobacco Atlas - History of tobacco, types of use, male and female smoking, youth, cigarette consumption, health effects, secondhand smoke, deaths, costs; the trade, the industry, smuggling, tobacco promotion and marketing, Internet sales, politics; activism, research, tobacco control, policy initiatives; quitting, litigation, pricing, and futures.
  • WHO Tobacco Free Initiative (TFI) - A WHO cabinet project created to focus international attention, resources and action on global tobacco use and problems caused by that use.
  • WhyQuit - Cold Turkey Quitting - A support group and education forum dedicated exclusively to the science and art of successful abrupt nicotine cessation.
  • "Crack" Nicotine in Cigarettes Varies Widely - New research measures amount of free-base nicotine in "the modern cigarette, a highly engineered nicotine delivery device". (July 28, 2003)
  • OncoLink: The Control and Manipulation of Nicotine and Cigarettes - 1994 news article. Kessler report on how the tobacco industry controls and manipulates nicotine in its product. (June 21, 1994)
  • ABC DayOne: Smoke Screen - Now-famous segment on nicotine manipulation in cigarettes. (February 28, 1994)

WOMEN's AND TOBACCO---REFERENCE

Saturday, May 1, 2010

RESEARCH STUDY-1

A Research Study In Saint louis University, America
Cigarette Smoking And Weight Loss In Nursing Home Residents
By



Margaret-Mary G. Wilson, MD,MRCP 
Assistant Professor
Division of Geriatric Medicine,
Saint Louis University
Shahnaz Habib MBBS,
Clinical research assistant
Division of Geriatric Medicine,
Saint Louis University
Carolyn Philpot CGNP
Clinical Nurse Practitioner
Division of Geriatric Medicine,
Saint Louis University


OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate body weight trends of elderly smokers following admission into a Long Term Care Facility.

STUDY DESIGN AND POPULATION:

Cross-sectional survey of 88 nursing home residents with six month follow-up.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

Fifty-one of 88 residents were included in the study. Body weight, height, body mass index (BMI) and serum albumin were documented on admission into the nursing home. Data collection was repeated at monthly intervals over a six-month period.
RESULTS: The study population comprised 17(8M, 9F) smokers and 34(19M, 15F) non-smokers. Smokers had a lower body mass index on admission compared with non-smokers (24.2"3 and 27.4"9 respectively; p=0.04; Odds ratio [95% CI] for smokers versus non-smokers = 1.629 [0.498 to 5.32] ).Twelve (71%) smokers and 20 (59%) non-smokers gained weight (p=0.2). Four (24%) smokers and 12 (35%) non-smokers lost weight (p=0.3). Smokers who lost weight did so at a faster rate than non-smokers (13.3 "3.8 lbs and 7.8"2.4 lbs respectively over six months; p=0.02). Similarly, weight gain occurred at a slower rate in smokers compared with non-smokers (5.6"1.3lbs and 8.2lbs respectively over six months; p=0.004)

CONCLUSIONS:

Weight loss in cigarette smokers may occur at a more rapid in residents who smoke compared with non-smokers. Similarly, weight gain occurs at a slower rate in smokers. Smoking cessation should be encouraged as a critical adjunct to nutritional intervention in nursing home residents with nicotine dependence and weight problems.

Introduction

Intensive public health education has led to a decline in cigarette smoking over the past four decades. Increasingly, organizations and institutions are adopting non-smoking policies 1,2. Within long-term care (LTC), residents' rights to autonomy and self-determination preclude the enforcement of mandatory non-smoking policies 3. Epidemiological studies show that cigarette smoking is associated with progressive weight loss 4,5,6. However, although weight loss is an index of poor outcomes and increased mortality in nursing home residents, smoking cessation strategies are excluded from most nutritional and weight management LTC pathways 7,8. 9,10.
Our study was designed to examine the relationship between cigarette smoking and body weight of residents admitted to a long-term care facility over a six-month period. Non- smokers were compared with smokers.

Methods

The study was conducted in a long-term care geriatric facility affiliated with Saint Louis University. All residents of the facility were screened for the study. Exclusion criteria included congestive cardiac failure, malabsorption syndrome, chronic diarrhea, chronic obstructive airway disease, cor pulmonale, liver cirrhosis, or chronic renal failure. Residents with a Mini-mental State Examination score < 18 or a Geriatric Depression score > were also excluded 11,12. Enteral tube feeding and life expectancy less than six months were additional exclusion criteria.
Data collated included admission weight and monthly weights for six months following admission into the facility. The height and body mass index (BMI) on admission and monthly thereafter for six months were also obtained. Serum albumin levels within one month of admission and within one month of termination of the study were obtained. Residents were identified as smokers or non-smokers. Smokers were defined as residents who had smoked 10 cigarettes daily for at least ten years. Non-smokers were defined as residents who had not smoked any cigarettes over the preceding ten years. Residents who fell into neither category were excluded from the study. Data obtained from non-smokers were compared with data obtained from smokers. Significant differences between groups was evaluated using Sato's method to determine odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and the Student's t-test with two-tailed tests of significance for continuous variables 13. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects. The study was approved by the Institution Review Board of the Saint Louis University and the Executive Board of the Long Term Care facility.

Results

Eighty-eight residents were screened for the study. Fifty-one residents were eligible for inclusion, comprising 17 (8M, 9F) residents who smoked and 34 (19M, 15F) residents who were non-smokers. Eight (7M, 1F) smokers were admitted with body mass indices (BMI) less than 22, compared with 12 (7M, 5F) non-smokers (OR [95% CI] for smokers versus non-smokers = 1.629[0.498 to 5.32] ).
Table 1 shows the admission data for both smokers and non-smokers.
Fig 1 shows the trend of weight change over the six-month study period among smokers and non-smokers. Among the subset of residents that gained weight the mean weight gain among smokers was 5.6 "1.3lbs compared with 8.2"2.4lbs among non-smokers (p=0.004). Among the subset of residents that lost weight over the study period, the mean weight lost among smokers was 13.3"3.8lbs compared with 7.8"2.4lbs among non-smokers (p=0.02).

Discussion

Approximately 25% of nursing home residents smoke cigarettes 10, 14. Available evidence indicates that smoking cessation strategies are less successful within the long-term care setting. Studies show that adults who continue to smoke into late life are less likely to cease smoking out of concern for long-term health effects. Some older smokers erroneously believe that the passage of time has proven that they are no longer susceptible to the adverse health consequences of smoking. Likewise, older adults who suffer from smoking related illness often consider the damage permanent and irreversible and are therefore difficult to convince of the benefits of smoking cessation 15. Within the nursing home environment, low levels of perceived self-efficacy, the presence of other smokers and the reluctance of some health professionals to aggressively educate residents regarding the dangers of smoking pose additional obstacles to smoking cessation 16.
Currently, in most long-term care facilities in the United States, the institutional smoking policy is driven mainly by fire and safety concerns 17,18. Thus, residents are more likely to perceive smoking cessation policies as intrusive legislation rather than as an integral component of effective health maintenance. Development of more comprehensive smoking policies that highlight specific adverse health effects relevant to nursing home residents may be more successful in encouraging smoking cessation.
Body weight is a critical parameter of care and outcomes determinant within the nursing home setting. Convincing evidence indicates increased mortality in long term care residents with weight loss 19,20,21. Our data showed that smokers admitted into long term care had a BMI compared with non-smokers possibly as a result of the long-term effect of smoking on suppressing weight gain 5,8,22. In addition, although the prevalence of weight loss was not significantly different between smokers and non-smokers, smokers who lost weight in the nursing home, did so at a faster rate than non-smokers (Fig 1). Our study also showed that nursing home residents who smoked gained weight at a slower rate, compared with their non-smoking counterparts. It is conceivable that negative effects of smoking on food intake, such as anorexia and reduced olfactory and gustatory receptor sensitivity, may have a synergistic effect in the presence of other adverse nutritional risk factors, thereby accelerating weight loss 23,24,25, 26.


Cytokine-mediated weight loss is an attractive hypothesis to explain smoking related weight loss. However, available data is controversial. Cancer related cachexia is driven by increased elaboration of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The resultant metabolic abnormalities have been thought to account for the failure of conventional nutritional supplementation to maintain weight in affected cancer patients 27. Similar studies in smokers have failed to reveal a consistent alteration in cytokine levels 28,29. However, evidence indicates that smoking reduces baseline levels of soluble IL-1 receptor antagonist serum levels thereby resulting in reduced antagonism of pro-inflammatory interleukins 30. Weight loss in smokers may therefore result from a dual mechanism involving increased catabolism and reduced energy consumption.

Applications

These findings justify a more aggressive approach to nutritional support in smokers with low body weight or significant weight loss. Effective strategies include the administration of fortified meals and frequent nutritional supplementation with energy dense food supplements. Additionally, flavor-enhanced foods may be effective in increasing energy intake in older smokers as enhanced gustatory stimulation may combat the hypoageusia associated with both smoking and aging 31.
In smokers who continue to lose weight despite aggressive nutritional supplementation, orexigenic agents, such as megesterol acetate and dronabinol, may be helpful. Recent evidence indicates that megesterol acetate may enhance weight gain in nursing home residents. However, the absence of relevant data mandates cautious use of megesterol in smokers to avoid the possibility of a synergistic or additive increase in the risk of thrombo-embolic events. Dronabinol (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) is the active ingredient of Cannabis sativa, approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an orexigenic agent in Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). Recent evidence indicates that Dronabinol induces weight gain in older persons with dementia. However, it remains unclear whether weight gain in such patients is due to a direct orexigenic effect or a reduction in physical energy expenditure. Further research is needed to determine the precise role of Dronabinol as an orexigenic agent in older persons 32,33,34.


Effective weight loss intervention programs in long term care must incorporate parallel smoking cessation strategies. Clinical Practice Guidelines, such as those issued by the United States Department of Health and Human Services offer practical templates for such strategies 35,36, 37. In addition, emphasis should be placed on the immediate benefits of discontinuing smoking, such as enhanced taste, increased appetite, weight gain and an increased feeling of well-being. Residents with weight loss who opt to participate in a smoking cessation program may benefit from a structured support group directed toward both smoking cessation and weight maintenance.
The role of medication in LTC residents with weight loss is unclear. Nicotine replacement therapy may not be appropriate, as animal studies have shown that nicotine administration reduces food consumption and decreases body weight 38. Data in humans is lacking. However, residents who lose weight on nicotine replacement therapy may benefit from a trial of Bupropion in the absence of a history of seizures or co-existent antidepressant therapy.


Limitations of this study include lack body weight measurements prior to admission, small sample size and the imbalance in numbers between smokers and non-smokers. Larger prospective studies may prove helpful.

Conclusion

Smokers in long-term care facilities lost weight more rapidly than non-smokers. Similarly, weight was regained more slowly in smokers. Long term care health professionals must be cognizant of the role of smoking in perpetuating weight loss. Interdisciplinary programs that integrate nutritional support and smoking cessation strategies should be an integral component of resident care in LTC facilities that permit smoking. 
Acknowledgements: The authors gratefully acknowledge the valuable editorial assistance of Janice D. Hicks.

References


1. Escobedo LG, Peddicord JP. Smoking Prevalence in US birth cohorts: the influence of gender and education. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:231-236
2. Conway TL, Hurtado SL, Woodruff MA. Tobacco use: Prevention and cessation programs in the US Navy. Public Health Reports 1993;108:105-115
3. Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987, Public Law 100-203, Sections 4201(a), 4211(a). Washington, DC: Centers for Disease Control.
4. French SA, Jeffrey RW. Weight concerns and smoking: a literature review. Ann Behav Med 1995; 17:234-244
5. Klesges RC, Klesges LM, Meyers AW. Relationship of smoking status, energy balance, and body weight analysis of the second Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991;59:899-905
6. Williamson DF, Madans J, Anda RF et al. Smoking cessation and severity of weight gain in a national cohort. N Engl J Med 1991;324:739-745
7. Ryan C, Bryant E, Eleazar P et al. Unintentional weight loss in long term care: predictor of mortality in the elderly. Southern Medical Journal 1995;88(7):721-724.
8. . Tayback M, Kumanyika S, Chee E. Body weight as a risk factor in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 1990;150:1065-1072
9. Adler G, Greeman M, Rickers S, Kuskowski M. Smoking in Nursing Homes: Conflicts and Challenges. Soc Work Health Care 1997;25(4):67- 81.
10. Kochersberger G, Clipp EC. Resident smoking in long-care facilities - Policies and Ethics. Public Health Reports. 1996;111:66-70
11. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. " Mini-mental state." A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12:189-198.
12. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res 1982;17:189-198
13. Sato T. Confidence limits for the common odds ratio based on the asymptotic distribution of the Mantel-Haenszel estimator. Biometrics 1990;46:71-80
14. Max W. The financial impact of smoking on health related costs: a review of the literature. Am J Health Promotion. 2001; 15(5): 321-331
15. Sullivan LW. The health benefits of smoking cessation. DHSS publication No. 90-8416. 1990. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services
16. Cox JL. Smoking cessation in the elderly patient. Clinics in Chest Medicine. 1993;14(3):423-428
17. Kochersberger G, Clipp EC. Resident smoking in long-term care facilities - policies and ethics. Public Health Reports. 1996;111(1): 66-70
18. Barker JC, Lewis DE Jr. Smoking policy in long term care: a survey of administrators in San Fransisco. Journal of Health and Social Policy. 1998;10(1):81-100.
19. Ryan C, Bryant E, Eleazar P et al. Unintentional weight loss in long term care: predictor of mortality in he elderly. South Med J 1995;88(7):721-724.
20. Klesges RC, Klesges LM. Cigarette smoking as a dieting strategy in a university population. Int J Eating Disord. 1988;7:413-419
21. Weekley CKIII, Klesges RC, Reylea G. Smoking as weight control strategy and its relationship to smoking status. Addict Behav. 1992;17:259-271.
22. Moffat RG, Owens SG. Cessation from cigarette smoking: change in body weight, body composition, resting metabolism and energy consumption. Metabolism 1991;40:465-470.
23. Klesges RC, Ward KD, Ray JW et al. The prospective relationships between smoking and weight in a young biracial cohort: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998;66:987-993.
24. French SA, Jeffrey RW, Forster JL et al. Predictors of weight change over two years among a population of working class adults: the Healthy Worker Project. Int J Obesity1994;18:145-154.
25. Colditz GA, Segal MR, Myers AH et al. Weight change in relation to smoking cessation among women. J Smoking Relat Disord 1992;3:145-153.
26. Winkler S, Garg AK, Mekayarajjananonth T et al. Depressed taste and smell in geriatric patients. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130(12):1759-1765.
27. Barber MD, Ross JA, Fearon KC. Cancer Cachexia. Surgical Oncology. 1999;8(3):133-141
28. Sher ME, Bank S, Greenberg R et al. The influence of cigarette smoking on cytokine levels in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 1999;5(2)73-78
29. Satoh T, Tolterud DJ, Guevarra L et al. Chemiluminescence assays for cytokines in serum: influence of age, smoking, and race in healthy subjects. Arerugi 1995;44(7):661-669
30. Hofbauer LC, Muhlberg T, Konig A et al. Soluble IL-1 receptor antagonist levels in smokers and non-smokers with Graves Opthalmopathy undergoing orbital radiotherapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997;82(7):2244-2247.
31. Mathey MAM, Siebelink E, de Graaf C, Van Staveren WA. Flavor enhancement of food improves dietary intake and nutritional status of nursing home elderly. J Gerontol Med Sci 2001;56A:M200-M205
32. MacIntosh C, Morley JE, Chapman I. The anorexia of aging. Nutrition 2000;16:983 - 995
33. Voth EA, Schwartz RH. Medicinal applications of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and marijuana. Ann Intern Med 1997;126:791-798.
34. Volicer L, Stelly M, Morris J et al. Effects of Dronabinol on anorexia and disturbed behavior in patients with Alzheimers disease. Int J Geriat Psychiatry 1997;12:913-919
35. Fiore MC, Bailey WC, Cohen SJ et al. Treating tobacco use and dependence : Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Public Health Service, 2000
36. Coleman T. Smoking cessation: integrating recent advances into clinical practice. Thorax. 2001;56(7):579-582.
37. Senore C, Battista RN, Shapiro SH et al. Predictors of smoking cessation following physicians' counseling. Prevent Med 1998; 27:412-421.
38. Winders SE, Wilkins DR 2nd , Rushing PA, Dean JE. Effect of nicotine cyclingon weight loss and regain in male rats. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior. 1993;46(1):209-213
39. Committee for Diet and Health, Food and Nutrition Board. National Research Council Diet and Health. Diet and Health: implications for reducing chronic disease risk. Washington, D.C. : National Academy Press, 1989

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

WOMEN AND SMOKING-6

WOMEN AND SMOKING

An epidemic of smoking-related cancer 
and disease in women


When calling attention to public health problems, we must not misuse the word "epidemic." But there is no better word to describe the 600-percent increase since 1950 in women's death rates for lung cancer, a disease primarily caused by cigarette smoking. Clearly, smoking-related disease among women is a full-blown epidemic. --
David Satcher, MD, PhD 

Smoking is the most preventable cause of early death in this country. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), smoking-related diseases causes the deaths of about 178,000 women in the U.S. each year. On average, these women died 14.5 years earlier because they smoked. 

The most recent CDC survey (from 2008) showed that more than 1 in 6 American women aged 18 years or older (18.3%) smoked cigarettes. The highest rates were seen among American-Indian and Alaska-Native women (22.4%), followed by white (20.6%), African-American (17.8%), Hispanic (10.7%), and Asian women (4.7%). The less education a woman has, the more likely it is she will smoke. For instance, women with less than a high school education are more than twice as likely to smoke as college graduates. 

Overall, women are less likely to smoke than men. But it has been found that smoking is more popular among younger than older women. This is an alarming trend that will affect the future health of these young women. About 21% of women ages 25 to 44 smoke; only about 8% of women 65 and over do. If these younger women continue to smoke as they get older, they will have more smoking-related illness and disability. Smoking rates are slightly lower among women aged 18 to 24, about 19%.



Women who smoke nearly always begin as teenagers -- usually before high school graduation. And the younger a girl is when she starts, the more heavily she is likely to use tobacco as an adult. Teenage girls are just as likely to smoke as boys. The most recent CDC surveys showed that 19% of female high school students and 6% of middle school girls had smoked at least one cigarette in the past 30 days. More than 9% of 12th grade girls reported that they had smoked at least one cigar in the past month. Nearly 29% of the senior girls had used some form of tobacco in the past month.








































































































































Sunday, April 18, 2010

WOMEN AND SMOKING-4

Cigarettes May Be More Damaging to Women


Women may be especially susceptible to the toxic effects of cigarette smoking, U.S. researchers said on Monday.

They said women who smoke develop lung damage earlier in life than men, and it takes less cigarette exposure to cause damage in women compared with men.

"Overall our analysis indicated that women may be more vulnerable to the effects of smoking," said Dr. Inga-Cecilie Soerheim of Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston and the University of Bergen in Norway.

Soerheim, who presented her findings at the American Thoracic Society meeting in San Diego, California, said researchers had suspected this but until now had lacked proof.

Her team analyzed 954 people in Norway with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, which includes lung problems from chronic bronchitis to emphysema.

COPD affects an estimated 210 million people worldwide. The most common symptoms include shortness of breath, coughing and a limited ability to exercise.

In the study, about 60 percent were men and 40 percent were women. All were current or former smokers.

Overall, both groups had similar lung impairments. But when they looked at younger people -- those under age 60 -- or those who had been lighter smokers, they found women had more severe disease and worse lung function than men.

Friday, April 16, 2010

COLLEGE STUDENTS' ATTITUDE TOWARD SMOKING-3

Discussion

Generally, college students view smoking as a bad habit but want the right to smoke as evidenced by their varied responses to the survey questions pertaining to stricter laws. For instance, even though 94% agreed "smoking is hazardous to one's health," the students were divided on whether tougher laws against smoking should be instituted. However, the majority of college students believe others should not be injured by their smoking; for example, by smoking in an enclosed area. In addition, students said that people should be advised about the harmful effects of smoking and prohibited from smoking near pregnant women or near children. They also believed that second-hand smoke could cause health problems.
Students responded similarly to prior research reported by Hines et al. (1998) concerning attractiveness. For instance, Hines et al. reported students that smoked were rated as less attractive. Research at the University of West Florida found that although students disagreed with strong statements, such as "no one likes a smoker," they often agreed that smoking is unattractive and preferred a non-smoker in a spouse or steady partner.

College Students' Attitude Toward Smoking-2

contd.

Method
Instrument:          


The instrument consisted of one page with 14 demographic items on one side and 19 statements on the other side--all dealing with smoking. The statements were rated using a three point, Likert-type scale with the options "agree," "uncertain," or "disagree."

Procedure:

The subjects were approached on a face-to-face basis and invited to participate in the survey. To provide confidentiality, the subjects placed the finished form into a large brown, unmarked envelope.

Sample Population:

Approximately ten percent (810) of students were randomly selected after being stratified by gender and race from those attending the University of West Florida. The sample was stratified on gender and race and reflected the population of the University of West Florida with 40% male and 60% female. The racial distribution of the sample was 78% white, 10% black, 4% Hispanic, 5% Asian with 3% "other."
The largest percentage (43%) of the subjects were aged 19-21 with 22% being aged 22-25 and 19% being 26-40. Eight percent were 18 and below while 7% were 41 or above in age. Student classification showed that the majority junior/senior consisted of 58% of the sample with freshman/sophomore consisting of 33%. The rest were graduate students (7%) and special students (non-degree seeking students) 2%. Of the students participating in the research, 75% were full time undergraduate students with 16% being part-time students. Four percent were fulltime graduate students with 3% being part-time students.
Seventy percent were single and 21% separated, 6% divorced and 1% widowed. Seventy-five percent had no children, 13% had one child, 13% had two children, and 3% had three children with 1% having four or more children. Twenty-seven percent of the students lived alone while 22% lived with parents, 3% lived in a fraternity, 3% lived in a sorority, and 45% were living with others.
Twenty-seven percent were employed full-time, 46% part time and 27% were not employed at all. The largest percentage (30%) was earning $10,000 or less annually while 12% was earning $60,000 or more. In between, 21% were earning $10,001 to $20,000, 24% earned $20,000 to $40,000 and 14% earned $40,001 to $60,000.
Both Protestants and Catholics were represented in the sample by 25% each with 2% of the Jewish faith and 17% having no religious affiliation. Thirty-two percent indicated having some other faith but did not indicate the type. As to political registration, 36% were Republican, 30% Democrat and 12% Independent, while 18% were not registered; 3% were registered in other minority parties.

As to who smoked or not smoked, 33% reported that they smoked while 67% said they never smoked. Two percent said they smoked indoors, 15% smoked outdoors while 13% smoked both indoors and outdoors.

Findings

The study attempted to determine the college students' attitudes toward smoking at the University of West Florida in relation to the findings at other universities. For instance, some people believe that whether one smokes or not affects whether the person is liked. Nonetheless, to the statement, "no one likes a smoker," 67 % disagreed. Only 17% agreed and 16% were uncertain. Similarly, when asked whether "smoking is unattractive," 69% agreed while 21% disagreed and 10% were uncertain. As to how people feel about smokers, to the statement, "I would not date or marry a smoker," 41% agreed although 39% disagreed and 20% were uncertain. Some people are concerned about the personal and social effects of smoking. To the statement, "smoking is socially acceptable", 44% agreed while 35% disagreed; 21% were undecided. Some people are concerned with the implications of smoking. For example, to the statement, "people think less of you if you smoke," 43% disagreed; only 30% agreed and 27% were undecided.

Concerning health related issues, participants responded to the statement, "it is unwise to smoke in an enclosed area," with 81% agreeing and 10% disagreeing with 9% uncertain. Furthermore, whether "people should be advised about the harmful effects of smoking", 93% agreed. The rest (3%) disagreed or were undecided (4%). In addition, to the statement that "no one should smoke near a pregnant woman," 90% agreed. The rest were either uncertain (6%) or disagreed (4%). Whether smoking has any positive values, on the statement "smoking is helpful in reducing weight," only 24% agreed with 40% disagreeing; 36% were undecided. To the statement that "no one should smoke near children," a large majority (88%) agreed with the rest (4%) disagreeing or undecided (7%). Whether "second hand smoke can cause serious health problems," 81% agreed with only 4% disagreeing; but 15% were still undecided. Because of the impact of smoking upon one's health, the subjects were asked to respond to the statement that "smoking is hazardous to one's health" with 94% agreeing and the rest (3%) disagreeing or undecided (3%).
Regarding legal issues, many people believe that "there should be stricter laws against smoking" with 44% agreeing; 34% disagreed and 22% were undecided. To the statement that "the law should prohibit smoking in public places", 48% agreed although 35% disagreed; 17% were undecided. On the statement that "no one should smoke near someone who is eating," 69% agreed. 19% disagreed and 12% were undecided. Whether "people should tell a smoker to stop smoking", 51% disagreed; only 30% agreed while 19% were undecided.
Finally, in questions concerning the modeling effects of smoking, to the statement, "Smoking advertisements influence non-smokers to begin," only 32% agreed while 46% disagreed with 22% uncertain. However, some people were concerned about the influence that smoking has on children. To the statement, "children who see people smoke will more likely smoke," 51% agreed; 28% disagreed and 21% were uncertain. And whether "smokers have little power," 54% disagreed and 26% agreed (21% were uncertain).
                                                               
                                                           contd          .